Talking Business – Stuck in Google’s Doghouse – NYTimes.com
Talking Business – Stuck in Google’s Doghouse – NYTimes.com
Credit Where Credit’s Due…Trevor beat me to to punch on this one. Check out his comments at the link below.
http://swanbergcis.blogspot.com/2008/09/has-google-replaced-microsoft-as-next.html
This is a nice article about the potential monopoly power of Google. The line I like best is the one that notes (paraphrased) that monopolies can’t help from acting like monopolies. Google defends their monopoly power by arguing that they don’t take certain competitive actions against competitors because it’s all in the “algorithm.” Nevertheless, Google will tweak their algorithms in ways that are best for Google, and others must pay the price. Simply because the competitive moves are automated, doesn’t necessarily make them an improper use of monopoly power.
Of course, I love Google. The challenge here is that IT works better when systems are integrated, but you need competition for innovation. I’ll have to think on this more.
2 comments so far
Leave a reply
Incidentally I wrote a post last night about the same article. Agree with the comment on automated algorithims being out of their control, but it did seem a little suspicious that the one business was able to get added back to the “good wesbite list” manually?
typo on my name.